Mandatory Vaccination Risks Ruled Unconstitutional By Court

Concerned about vaccination risks? Me, too and currently the swine flu shot is a real cause for concern, IMO. Good news, though, from a press release on August 12 of this year: opponents of the forced flu vaccination won an injunction against the federal government to stop these. Notice this comment from the press release:

The federal government has stated it will force these flu vaccines onto the American public against their will, under a document signed by Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.

This is a direct assault on the liberty of the citizens of this country! I WILL NOT ACCEPT A SWINE FLU VACCINATION! For instance, notice this: "Vawter charged that the federal government has engaged in gross negligence by failing to properly investigate factual evidence submitted by esteemed medical professions over many years which proves flu vaccines have caused serious damage to people. The CDC has stated that thimerosal mercury is being used in the new flu vaccines being prepared.". Mercury? Yes, that’s great for the human body. Many doctors believe the swine flu vaccines are much more dangerous than the swine flu.

Do you disagree? That’s cool and it’s your option to get a swine flu vaccination. But leave the rest of us alone!

Now for the text of this release.



30 years after compulsory vaccination became US Law U S Court issues an injunction to stop it and to hold the the government and drug companies responsible for reactions.

A Preliminary Injunction to stop mandatory vaccinations has been issued in the United States District Court of New Jersey. This comes after a federal lawsuit opposing forced vaccines was filed in that court by Tim Vawter, pro se attorney, on July 31st with the federal government as defendant. When the judge signs the Preliminary Injunction, it will stop the federal government from forcing anyone in any state to take flu vaccine against their will. It will also prevent a state or local government from forcibly vaccinating anyone, and forbid any person who is not vaccinated from being denied any services or constitutional rights. Vawter’s filings included a Complaint, and several pages of evidentiary Exhibits.

Vawter’s legal papers have been written not only for filing in federal court, but additionally so they can be looked at by activists around the world for ideas on filing lawsuits in their own countries to help stop forced vaccinations. Vawter believes that as the truth of the dangers of flu vaccines continues to become known, banning the forced use of them will eventually succeed on a worldwide basis. He cautions people to avoid fear and keep themselves focused on the task of blocking forced vaccination.

Preliminary Injunction will immediately halt mandatory vaccinations in the U.S.

The Court, having heard the Motion for Preliminary Injunction and read the papers in its support, states in the Preliminary Injunction that it appears the federal government has engaged in some amount of negligence with regards to failure to properly investigate the safety of the flu vaccines scheduled for use in late 2009-2010, and the evidence submitted does warrant a more thorough investigation into the safety of the flu vaccines.

The Court ordered that the government shall be forbidden from forcing any person to be required to take any influenza vaccination against that person’s free will and free choice. The government will not allow any state or local government, or any party, to force any person to be required to take any influenza vaccination against that person’s free will and free choice.

U.S. government sued for gross negligence and violation of the
Constitution

In his Cause of Action, Vawter charged that the federal government has engaged in gross negligence by funding and promoting flu vaccines that are proven to be dangerous and manufactured with little oversight. The vaccines scheduled for use in late 2009 and 2010 contain heavy metals including thimerosal mercury, which have been proven to cause autism in children with lowered immune systems, and other dangerous and toxic ingredients. The federal government has stated it will force these flu vaccines onto the American public against their will, under a document signed by Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.

He further charged that the vaccine makers stand to earn billions of dollars selling vaccines, and are already spending tens of millions
advertising a "Phase 6 Pandemic" that the evidence shows does not really exist. The federal government has not required the World Health Organization (WHO) to show evidence of such a pandemic. There has been no collection of facts, sworn testimony, witnesses being questioned, hearings being held, or lie detector tests being given when preposterous statements have been made. The WHO declared a massive "Phase 6 Influenza Pandemic", even though only a few hundred people worldwide had so far died of this swine flu virus, and when far more people die each year of regular flu.

Vawter noted there is a preponderance of evidence to show that the federal government so poorly trained its employees that they eagerly agreed with the unsubstantiated claims of the WHO in the face of evidence to the contrary.

Forced vaccination would violate the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution by allowing the government to enter homes and force people to be vaccinated, or to forcibly remove people to another location for vaccination. It would also violate Fifth Amendment Constitutional rights by depriving people of liberty without due process of law.

Vawter charged that the federal government has engaged in gross negligence by failing to properly investigate factual evidence submitted by esteemed medical professions over many years which proves flu vaccines have caused serious damage to people. The CDC has stated that thimerosal mercury is being used in the new flu vaccines being prepared.

The government has failed to investigate profiteering. Billions of dollars in vaccine sales can cause organizations to falsify threats so as to cause unwarranted public hysteria leading to forced vaccinations.

The government is guilty of gross negligence because its employees failed to properly investigate the release of a case of live swine flu virus. One of the main companies the government deals with, Baxter Vaccines, was apparently involved in the transporting of live bird flu virus that was released on a public train earlier this year. A lab technician with the Swiss National Center for Influenza in Geneva had traveled to Zurich to collect eight ampoules, five of which were filled with the H1N1 swine flu virus. However, failure of the dry ice in their container allowed pressure to build up, and the ampoules exploded as the train was pulling into a station.

The highly reputable UK newspaper "the Telegraph" reported on July 2nd that flu vaccines tested on homeless people caused twenty-one of them to die.

Vawter charged there is a preponderance of evidence to show that government will not provide people being vaccinated with a list of the vaccine ingredients and possible negative side effects before they are vaccinated. Most of the public will not know this flu vaccine contains thimerosal mercury.

Vawter submitted an Order to force the government to publish vaccine ingredients and side effects, and to give this information to everyone who takes a flu vaccine, and do so at least 3 days prior to their vaccination. A denial of this order would violate Plaintiff’s rights to demand the government obey the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution by requiring it to engage in freedom of speech. The First Amendment not only allows a citizen to have freedom of speech himself, but it allows a citizen to demand his government engage in freedom of speech when it is promoting the use of such as these vaccinations to the public.

The government proclamation stating a person cannot sue for any damages he receives from the flu vaccine, completely bypasses the congress and the court system in violation of the Seventh Amendment of the Constitution which grants the right to sue to recover for damages. Vawter submitted an Order to deem unconstitutional any proclamation, rule or similar law that forbids people from suing for damages resulting from the vaccines of 2009 and 2010.


Apparently, many other agree about the greatly exaggerated fear of swine flu. This is from a poll on Mixx. Bet’cha can’t guess how I voted? I haven’t been on any bar stools lately, but they ARE pretty dangerous. :-)

Click here to submit your review.


Submit your review
* Required Field

Comments

  1. US District Judge Joel A. Pisano denied Vawter's motion for a preliminary injunction on October 2.
    He wrote: "In support of his motion, Plaintiff relies on the bare allegations in his papers, copies of
    “magazine articles [he] printed out from the Internet” (Vawter Aff. dated August 6, 2009), and
    videos he obtained from YouTube.com (id.). Plaintiff’s submissions are simply not sufficient
    to establish that the aforementioned elements weigh in favor of granting the “extraordinary
    and drastic remedy” Plaintiff seeks."

    A valiant, albeit insufficient, effort.

  2. It's amazing that court action is even necessary for vaccines that should be mandatory. It's up to each person to make these kinds of decisions for their own body. I strongly dislike any government deciding such issues for us.

  3. Reminds me of Nazi Germany.

    • Me, too, Quinn. A lot of what's going on today reminds me of Nazi Germany.

    • Strategic says:

      You are so right! It is exactly the type of philosophy that was going on. "For the common good". Nazi Germany didn't happen overnight, it was a slow process. First forced sterilization for the "unfit" or "undesirables", then it went to "merciful deaths", etc. Jews were accepted, then slowly weeded out and seen as the downfall of their society. Isn't it interesting that society is criminalizing the "unvaccinated" for vaccination failures? If you are vaccinated, you shouldn't have to worry about those that choose not to vaccinate. You're supposed to be immune, remember?

      And what Hitler didn't do, was control the entire populace through drugs. Vaccinations are drugs, which people willing give their arm over. No matter what your belief is, humanity is lost once the powers to be believe they can choose what another does with their body or their child's.

      • Exactly! We always believe a dictatorship can't happen here … how many societies have believed that and found out they were wrong? There are examples everywhere. A great one is the incident in North Carolina when a government 'inspector' told a 2nd grade girl that the lunch her mom sent wasn't nutritious enough. So this Hitler-in-training took away the child's lunch and gave her a plate of chicken nuggets!!! Yeah, processed, fried, pieces of chicken are a very healthy meal … NOT!

        Your point is excellent: " If you are vaccinated, you shouldn't have to worry about those that choose not to vaccinate. You're supposed to be immune, remember?"

  4. heavymetalduck says:

    Not true,this was from 2009 . .http://rense.com/general87/mislead.htm

  5. Farmer Bob says:

    From a public health standpoint…the needs of the few are and should always be outweighed by the needs of the many. If forcing a vaccine on a population guarantees that 99% of them don't die from that disease than by all means please force away….

    • Sorry, Farmer Bob, but we'll have to disagree on this one. Big Brother forcing unwanted vaccinations on people is horrifying to many of us. I will make my own decisions about my health. Besides, the effects of vaccinations are highly controversial and they are not always benign.

Speak Your Mind

*