The argument about raw vs cooked food is often a fiery one, with propents fiercely combatting each other. We can't provide a "once and for all" answer to this powerful question,. but the more you know about the pros/cons of each way of eayting, the mor elikely you are to make a good decision for your life.
Should food be cooked or is raw consumption healthier? People have been trying to discover the optimal version for years. Both cooking and the consumption of raw foods have its advantages that need to be assessed carefully.
Raw food tendencies have been gaining popularities lately. Celebrities eat raw foods and raw food restaurants are a major hit. Is there any truth behind the raw food movement or is it just fashionable today?
According to raw food supporters, cooking processes take away healthy elements from products and it may also be responsible for various kinds of diseases. Research, however, fails supporting the claim that people who eat raw are healthier.
In addition, most supporters of the raw movement give up the idea during some point. It may be exceptionally difficult to go all raw and to keep on consuming fresh and diverse foods.
Traditional cooking techniques are used to kill many harmful bacteria that are found in unprocessed milk, meat and even some kinds of vegetables. Thermal processing is very important for the battle against harmful bacteria that may be otherwise present in fresh food products.
Raw food supporters, however, claim that thermal processing may also be responsible for various diseases. In addition, thermal processing destroys many of the vitamins and healthy nutrients that are found in raw fruits and vegetables.
Yet, a number of nutrients get enriched through the process of thermal processing. Nutritional sciences are still incapable of giving a specific and 100 percent evidence-supported answer. Studies concerned to the benefits of each type of diet remain limited and somehow questionable.
People who are into the raw food craze claim that milk and even meat products are richer and more nutritional when they remain uncooked. This type of consumption, however, may lead to specific dangers.
The question remains unanswered. Both sides have a valid point to make and it may be difficult to choose one option over the other and to claim that it is more advisable and beneficial.
A truly healthy raw diet requires a lot of planning and determination. The selection of the best foods and the maintenance of a nutritional balance could be difficult. Relying entirely on processed foods is unadvisable, as well. Cooking can destroy so many beneficial elements that raw products contain.
A raw diet may be a great way to detoxify the organism and to give it a break from heavy, difficult to digest meals. At the same time, moderation and a balance between raw and cooked products is probably easiest to achieve.
Do eat a lot of fresh fruits and vegetables. Fresh nuts are also healthier and rich in valuable nutrients. The consumption of unprocessed milk, however, could be dangerous. It is best to go for pasteurized milk. The same applies to meat products. A vegetarian diet may be a great way to relieve the digestive system from the burden it is facing on a daily basis.
Both raw and cooked foods can provide specific nutritional advantages. Before deciding on the diet, try to find out which nutrients get strengthened through thermal processing and which ones get destroyed. Being informed and trying to achieve balance is the best way to keep yourself and your family healthy.
Jamie Highland is an article writer for My Baby Shower Favors, a site that sells baby shower favors and other supplies like babyshowergames. Jamie also writes about health and nutrition topics and in the article above discusses the benefits and drawbacks of raw food.