Deadly Flu Shot Side Effects Make Compulsory Flu Shots A Crime

It’s no exaggeration to say that there are DEADLY flu shot side effects and flu shot reactions that are especially dangerous for children, and yet …

==> New Jersey is the first state in the nation to requite mandatory flu shots for preschoolers, but Ontario province in Canada has a similar requirement and other states are considering following suit.

==> In New York, Assembly Bill 10942 would make all vaccines recommended by the CDC mandatory for all children to attend school and, and for the first time, vaccines would become mandatory for infants and toddlers.

“Under this law, regardless of previous adverse reactions, genetic susceptibility, parental objection or any other condition, girls will be forced to receive 70 doses of vaccines, boys 67,  by the time they are 18 years old, including vaccines for sexually transmitted diseases, regardless of parental approval.”

This is a criminal action on the part of over-zealous legislators who have no moral grounds whatsoever to interfere with the rights of parents, to whom this decision rightfully belongs.

The most common type of flu vaccine given to children is called Fluzone, with each dose containing 25 ug of mercury. CDC recommendations include administering the flu vaccine to children beginning at six months of age and then on an annual basis, for the rest of their lives!

According to the news, “At the two day Medical conference entitled ‘Should vaccinations be compulsory or free choice?’ Doctors from various areas of the world were invited to present the situation in their country and also to highlight problems surrounding some of the vaccines.”

What gives doctors the right to decide what we’re going to put into OUR bodies?

Do you know how the ingredients of the current flu vaccines are chosen?

Somebody guesses that this is what they flu will be like!

Yes, guesses. Some science.

This excellent article from the April 2000 issue of Alive magazine says it all …

= = =

The Flu Vaccine Myth

Croft Woodruff

Statistically, you’d be more likely to avoid the flu if you took nothing at all. So why are we subjected to the flu vaccine media blitz each year?

In Vancouver, a BCTV reporter, commenting on the current flu epidemic that is overloading BC hospital emergency wards, claimed that of 32 people who were vaccinated, 30 caught the flu. Immediately, the news anchor intoned “It is not too late to get your flu shot. The vaccine is 70 percent effective.” [BCTV News Hour, January 11/00]

How does a 93.75 percent failure rate for the vaccine translate into a 70 percent effectiveness? Here is a vaccine with a success rate of 6.25 percent. This is an amazing under-achievement, since the average placebo response to distilled water injections is 30 percent-even to cure chronic low back pain.

How can any drug company manufacture a drug which has nearly five times less of a positive response than virtually nothing at all? How does such a questionable treatment get past federal health regulators?

According to Hugh Fudenberg, MD, the world’s leading immunogeneticist and 13th most quoted biologist of our times (nearly 850 papers in peer review journals), if an individual has had five flu shots between 1970 and 1980 (the years studied) her chances of getting Alzheimer’s Disease is 10 times higher than if she had one, two or no shots.

When asked why this was so, Fudenberg said it was due to the mercury and aluminum that is in every flu shot (and most childhood shots). The gradual mercury and aluminum buildup in the brain causes cognitive dysfunction. Is this why the number of those suffering from Alzheimer’s is expected to quadruple?

Creating herd immunity through mass vaccinations seems to be justified in the name of sacrificing a few for the greater good of the majority. It means people are expendable. Some would call this premeditated murder. This was what the Nuremburg Trials were about after World War II.

People cannot and must not be medicated or subjected to experimentation against their will. It also flies totally in the face of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Vaccines consist of mainly three categories of ingredients. The first are cultured bacteria and viruses. The second ingredient is the medium in which they are cultivated. This may be chick embryo, chicken or duck egg protein, pig or horse blood, dog kidney tissue, monkey kidney tissue, calf serum, rabbit brain tissue, aborted human fetal cells or cowpox pus. These foreign proteins are injected directly into the bloodstream. They are not subject to the stomach’s hydrochloric acid. The enzymes of digestion are absorbed into the blood and carried directly to the liver.

Like insect stings or snake bites, these foreign proteins and other toxic byproducts have the potential for a mild to severe or fatal reaction.

Vaccines also contain stabilizers, neutralizers, carrying agents and preservatives such as formaldehyde, mercury and aluminum. As noted previously, mercury and aluminum are neurological poisons-they accumulate in the brain. Formaldehyde is a known carcinogen and is used to embalm the dead. There is no safe level of formaldehyde injected into a living organism.

Life After Vaccines

Sweden banned the pertussis vaccine in 1979, considering it both dangerous and ineffective -infant mortality dropped afterward. Sweden now maintains one of the lowest incidence of infant mortality in the world. In 1975, Japan raised the age of the pertussis vaccine to two years of age considering it a danger in infancy. Since that time, Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) has largely disappeared.

Nations with voluntary vaccine programs such as Canada and the United Kingdom have lower infant mortality rates than the US. Before the 1960s and the move to mandatory mass childhood vaccinations, the US had the second best infant mortality rate in the world. Forty years of mass immunizations later, with a childhood series of more than 34 vaccine mixtures prior to entering 1st grade, the US has dropped to number 24. Why does the wealthiest nation in the world, with all its vaunted health technology and medical know-how, have such a dismal record for infant mortality?

Every year in the US, 12,000 to 14,000 reports of adverse reactions associated with vaccinations-including hospitalizations, permanent brain damage and death-are reported to the Food and Drug Administration. Any drug on the market with a fraction of this record would be recalled in short order. Recent Measles Mumps Rubella (MMR) vaccine campaigns in the US have coincided with a 200 per cent rise in the incidence of autism. Hepatitis B vaccine alone has been responsible for 25,000 reports of adverse reactions including optic neuritis, brain damage, paralytic polio and sudden death.

There is not an insurance underwriter who will offer liability coverage for drug companies in the event any of their vaccines cause death or disability to the recipient. One would think this should give cause to reflect on the value of official assurances of vaccine safety. Indeed, the US government assumed liability for vaccine damage because the manufacturers could not get insurance. Since 1987, over a billion US dollars have been paid out to compensate only 10 percent of the claimants.

The current effort to make vaccines compulsory world wide will be a license to print money for the vaccine producers and an iatrogenic health disaster of the first magnitude.

Health professionals and others in work situations requiring compulsory vaccines are faced with hard choices. If there is a family history of allergy or anaphylactic reaction, they may be able to apply for exemption on medical grounds. Otherwise, you take your chances with vaccine roulette.

Croft Woodruff is president (since 1991) of the EDTA Chelation Association of British Columbia.

= = =

Those folks who are unconcerned about flu shot side effects and flu shot reactions are perfectly welcome to take the shots. BUT … leave the rest of us alone!

Click here to submit your review.


Submit your review
* Required Field

Comments

  1. Clearly the flu shot is proving to cause more damage than good. The reports are showing we are better off avoiding these shots. Why is the government pushing them on us?

  2. If these shots are only made of natural ingredients, I bet it will be a lot safer. flu shots are supposed to be protecting us from diseases not harming us.

  3. The spanish flu was a myth as it did not come from spain but American military bases in Spain, all the soldiers were given vaccines ,it then mutated and spread like wildfire, but really came from the actual vaccine. Refuse the flu jab and tell everyone else to, it could save your life. 5% of people die immediately after taking the shot i.e Within a short space of time weeks, sometimes days or even straight away.

    • jjacko: when we read the ingredients it's clear that they're harmful to the human body. It's obvious that the goal of government and Big Pharma is to make all of us into junkies. It's shocking the see the number of drug ads on TV and they send consumers to their doctors clamoring for such and such a drug. I just love when they hurriedly race through the side effects at the end of the commercial. If it weren't so serious, it would be funny.

  4. Brian I agree 100%. WHY are they trying to make us take shots whether we want to or not? Just because it's the natura of government to constantly increase its power. Big Brother is alive and well and our liberties are under constant assault.

Speak Your Mind

*